Praxis SLP Licensure Exam

If an SLP is contacted to treat a patient's Wernicke's aphasia via telepractice but lacks licensure in that patient's state, what is the best course of action?

1. Recommend against treatment due to lack of evidence

2. Recommend against treatment as the patient is already receiving services

3. Share the case information with a licensed SLP in the patient’s state

4. Refer the friend to a licensed SLP in that state

The correct answer is: Refer the friend to a licensed SLP in that state

In situations where an SLP is not licensed to practice in a particular state, the most appropriate action is to refer the patient to a licensed SLP in that state. This ensures that the patient receives care from a qualified professional who is familiar with the specific regulations and requirements of that jurisdiction. Referring the patient signifies a commitment to ethical practice and patient safety. An SLP can provide continuity of care by directing the patient to someone who is equipped to assess and treat Wernicke's aphasia within the bounds of state licensing laws. This step respects both the legalities of practice and the patient's right to receive effective treatment from a licensed provider, ultimately supporting better outcomes for the patient. While other options may address aspects of treatment or evidence, they do not provide the patient with immediate access to the care they require, which is critical for addressing communication disorders like Wernicke's aphasia. Therefore, referring the patient to a licensed SLP in that state is the correct and most responsible course of action.