Enhance your readiness for the Praxis SLP Licensure Exam with quizzes that include multiple choice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations to boost your confidence for the exam day!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


When a child struggles with the production of the /l/ phoneme, which method of intervention is most appropriate?

  1. Minimal contrast method

  2. Distinctive feature approach

  3. Integral stimulation approach

  4. Cycles remediation approach

The correct answer is: Integral stimulation approach

The integral stimulation approach is particularly effective for addressing the production of specific sounds like the /l/ phoneme, especially in young children. This method, often referred to as the "watch, listen, and do" technique, involves modeling the target sound in a structured manner, prompting the child to imitate while providing multisensory input. This can include visual cues, auditory examples, and kinesthetic involvement, which are beneficial for children who may have difficulty producing certain sounds. By incorporating these sensory modalities, the integral stimulation approach helps to reinforce the correct articulation of the /l/ sound through repetition and practice in a supportive environment. It can lead to enhanced learning and memory retention regarding the sound production. The other methods listed may not be as effective for this specific issue. For instance, the minimal contrast method focuses on teaching differences between phonemes by contrasting them with similar ones, which might not provide the tailored support needed for a child struggling specifically with the /l/ sound. The distinctive feature approach emphasizes the characteristics of phonemes, which may not directly translate into improved production for /l/. The cycles remediation approach targets multiple sounds over consecutive sessions and may serve broader phonological goals rather than individualized support for a single phoneme like /l/.